Showing posts with label Community Values - Social Comment. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Community Values - Social Comment. Show all posts

Saturday 20 December 2014

Christmas 2014

During the second half of the 20th Century, Christmas  generally become synonymous with gift giving, Christmas trees and rampant consumer spending. In contrast, prior to the Second World War, it was a far more limited celebration which was largely confined to the middle and wealthier classes in Great Britain and Europe although there was a limited involvement for the working class. It's worth reflecting on the deeper origins of this festive season to provide a broader perspective than the current pre-season sales would otherwise project.

The word itself is derived from Middle English Cristemasse which dates back to the 11th and 12th Centuries in various uses and basically meant Christian mass. The Cristen part is derived from earlier Greek and Hebrew terms such as Khristos and Messiah (which means 'anointed'). The masse part comes from the Latin 'missa' or celebration of the Eucharist. In short it was simply a celebration of religious observance. All of the additional 'accessories' were added in later centuries with the major gift giving and large meals occurring in the late 19th and 20th Centuries.  As for the birth of Christ, on which this observance originates,  it is generally accepted by scholars and religious historians that the year Jesus was born was between a period of 7 BC and 2 BC. There is no certainty as to the exact month or day. The choice of the 25th December occurred during the 4th Century AD within the Western Christian Church and later adopted by the Eastern Church.  In most respects this makes little difference in any meaningful manner as the true value of the event is the focus on others rather than oneself. In that sense the Spirit of Christmas transcends the fixation with pre-Christmas discounts and Boxing Day Sales. Peace be with you wherever you may reside.

Sunday 11 August 2013

Social interaction: gestures and expressions are not always what they seem

Confused or what emotion ?
Understanding and reading people's body language and expressions has underpinned a range of professions and marketing/human resource functions for many years. An increasing cohort of research studies however is starting to completely debunk much of these assumptions and indicate many 'rules' of body language are arbitrary instead. A number of examples place the contrast between implied meaning and actual sentiment in context: it is often commonly believed that crossed arms is a sign of defensiveness yet researchers at the University of Chicago found that the same arm-cross can also mean 'invulernability' if linked to a super-erect torso; a well known and popular notion that women show interest in a man through flipping their hair, making eye contact or adjusting their clothes should only be interpreted as a time based activity - they only use this body language to keep the man interested long enough to judge whether it's worth knowing him or not - the University of Vienna estimated that this measurement takes only 4 minutes or so.

Researchers at the University of Hertfordshire in the United Kingdom, found that fidgeting and avoiding eye contact which is often  associated with dishonesty was found in equal measure in people who were otherwise honest but simply showing signs of emotional discomfort. If there is one primary message to draw from this data its simply that gut-instinct is just as effective as any other measure.



Posture

What people think it means....



Actual science finding....
Arms crossed:
Defensive
Perhaps but it can also mean invulnerable, self-comforting or being cold.
Hands on hips, wide stance:

Power and/or confidence
True
Scratching nose:
Deceit or misleading
No more common for liars than truth-tellers.

Looking up and to the right:

Deceit or misleading
No evidence to support this view.
Swaggering walk:

Confidence
Not necessarily – can be faked.
Averting gaze:
Deceptive
False, A misconception in many cultures: could be embarrassment.
Fidgeting:

Embarrassed
True
Raised arms, chin up:

Triumph, pride
True in all cultures.
Palms up when talking:
Trustworthy
No evidence to support this view.



Monday 6 May 2013

How the public perceive professions in Australia - nurses at the top and car salesmen at the bottom

The issue of reputation, trust and ethics and the public's perception of various professions is always a  survey exercise which provides few surprises and, in practice, reinforces opinions commonly reflected in social situations. In this sense people actually do state what they think with little camouflage or sugar coating. Roy Morgan have released the latest survey results of the public's perception of the honesty and ethical standards of various professions - the survey has been an annual exercise since 1979. Car salesmen remain at the bottom of the survey, a position which has not changed once over the 30 years since the survey commenced. Nurses remain in the no 1 position which has remained unchanged since that profession was first added to the list, 19 years ago.

Respondents were asked: “As I say different occupations, could you please say — from what you know or have heard - which rating best describes how you, yourself, would rate or score people in various occupations for honesty and ethical standards (Very High, High, Average, Low, Very Low)?”

Roy Morgan Image of Professions Survey 2013
1
Nurses
2
Doctors
3
Pharmacists
4
Engineers
5
Teachers
6
Dentists
7
High Court Judges
8
Supreme Court Judges
9
Police
10
Univerity Lecturers
11
Accountants
12
Ministers of Religion
13
Bank Managers
14
Lawyers
15
Public Servants
16
Public opinion pollsters
17
Directors of Public Companies
18
Financial Planners
19
Business Executives
20
Newspaper journalists
21
TV reporters
22
Talk-back radio announcers
23
Stock brokers
24
Union leaders
25
Federal Members of Parliament
26
Insurance brokers
27
State Members of Parliament
28
Real Estate Agents
29
Advertising people
30
Car salesmen