Showing posts with label Science - Asteroid Collisions - Options for action. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Science - Asteroid Collisions - Options for action. Show all posts

Saturday 1 June 2013

Eyes in Space - Canada's sentinel in the sky

Canada's NEOSSat
The surprise explosion of a meteor over Russia on 15th February this year, again served as a reminder of the vulnerability of the planet and its' inhabitants to contact with near-earth objects. The meteor was undetected and estimated to be approx 17 metres wide delivering a 470-kiloton blast with a shock wave that damaged 3,000 buildings and injured over 1,500 people in the Chelyabinsk region of Russia.

Canada has added to the relatively small number of assets available for space monitoring with the launch on 25 February 2013 of the Near-Earth Object Surveillance Satellite (NEOSSat). The suitcase-sized NEOSSat orbits approximately 800 kilometres above the Earth, searching for near-Earth asteroids that are difficult to see using ground-based optical telescopes. NEOSSat is not limited by the day-night cycle but operates round the clock. It circles the globe every 100 minutes, scanning space near the Sun to pinpoint asteroids that have proximity to the Earth. Despite the additional surveillance there remains a significant number of unseen objects as shown below. 

Size in metres
Unknown %
1,000 upwards
7%
150-999
67%
40-149
99%

Saturday 20 October 2012

Asteroid collisions - size doesn't matter after all


The idea that asteroid collisions with Earth pose any more a direct threat than science fiction films from Hollywood would portray ('Deep Impact' ) is a common belief not readily shared by many astronomers. This conventional and common understanding is grounded in a perception of a giant asteroid hurtling to earth in an event similar to the extinction of the dinosaurs. In reality, much smaller and more readily Near Earth Objects (NEO) which traverse similar orbits can, in fact, do extraordinary damage without actually striking the planet.

This was demonstrated all too effectively by the Tunguska event where a very powerful explosion occurred near the Podkamennaya Tunguska River in what is now Krasnoyarsk Krai, Russia, in the early morning on June 30,1908. It is estimated the asteroid,measuring 70 meters in diameter entered Earth's atmosphere travelling at a speed of approx 33,500 miles per hour and during its rapid descent, the space object heated the air surrounding it to 44,500 degrees Fahrenheit. At 7:17 a.m. (local Siberia time), at a height of about 28,000 feet, the combination of pressure and heat caused the asteroid to fragment and explode, producing a fireball and releasing energy equivalent to about 185 Hiroshima atomic bombs (NASA). 2,000 square kilometers of forest was destroyed. The above ground explosion is in fact referred to as an ‘air burst’ and constitutes the more likely threat to the Earth from asteroids. The Tunguska asteroid is now considered to have been much smaller than first estimates and was probably 30-50 meters in diameter. Measurement of sizes of asteroids suggests that even relatively small objects with the correct mass, trajectory and speed would be able to create a downward directed blast from an air burst with devastating results.The images in this post show the effects of the 1908 blast, many years after it occurred.

Saturday 26 September 2009

Scanning the Heavens

The recent exercise in December 2008 by the US Air Force to assess the ability to cope with a collision with a Near Earth Object again highlighted how limited is the Earth's capability to detect or prevent such an event taking place. Recently however a Near Earth Object did indeed come into contact with the Earth in October 2008. Designated 2008 TC3 this car sized object exploded over the Sudan but was only spotted by a telescope (the Catalina Sky Survey) with 20 hours notice and at a distance of 500,000 kilometres from our planet. Although the likelihood of a catastrophic asteroid collision is extremely rare, the potential for a strike from a smaller but still destructive near earth body has much greater plausibility.

This situation again raises the need for a greater overall surveillance of the space around Earth and in relation to the Earth's orbit around the Sun. The proposal to increase surveillance through the Panoramic Survey telescope and Rapid Response System (Pan-STARRS) as well as the proposed Large Synoptic Survey Telescope in Chile (providing the project is completed by 2015) will complement the existing monitoring programs. The next question is what action to take if a large body is located on a trajectory to Earth.

Monday 30 March 2009

Asteroids and the threat to Earth


The question of what action to take when there is the possibility of an asteroid collision with the Earth periodically surfaces from time to time in science and astronomy circles. With impact craters clearly visible on most continents (and most recently discovered in the Yukatan Peninsula in the Gulf of Mexico) and the theory that an asteroid strike led to the demise of the dinosaur age (at the end of the Cretaceous period), this matter is one which won't disappear. The options of how to prevent a collision are not numerous but in practical terms only a handful have any chance of success. Asteroid Ida (pictured) is 35 klms in length and is located in the asteroid belt and does not cross Earth's orbit but represents the size and scale of many of these bodies floating in relatively nearby space.
One option often canvassed is to actually destroy an asteroid through the detonation of a nuclear device below the surface however the most obvious pitfall is without knowing precisely the composition and density of the material, the only result may be to splinter the asteroid and create additional possible impacts on the Earth. More favourably considered are strategies of 'nudging' an asteroid away using nuclear explosions in near proximity or alternatively a concentrated range of laser beams using solar power from reflected rays of the sun with the same effect.
Whatever the possible solutions may be, the principal concern is to be able to actually detect an asteroid before it's too close. In that respect space surveillance programs have fallen on hard times and its more luck than intention when an asteroid is located travelling nearby.